(Galveston mural by Reginald Adams)
In June 1861, when the jayhawker James Montgomery was
commissioned by the governor of Kansas as “Colonel of the Third Regiment of
Volunteers for the United States Service,” he was joining up to fight for the
abolition of slavery. He was soon recruiting Black teamsters in 1861 and Black
soldiers in 1862, and by 1863 and 1864, most of the troops he commanded were African-American.
They joined the Army for the same reason he had, to abolish slavery.
But that did not apply to most northern soldiers in
1861, who volunteered to preserve the Union, and were suspicious of – or
recoiled from -- radicals like Montgomery and his now deceased comrade John
Brown who had helped bring on the war.
Nor did Abraham Lincoln, the country’s new anti-slavery
president, describe himself as an abolitionist. Prior to the Confederate attack
on Fort Sumter, he was trying to avoid the approaching conflict, reasonably
fearful of its terrible cost. And when the war started, he reasonably
calculated that immediately embracing abolition would guarantee a quick
Confederate victory, because it would alienate more potential supporters of the
Union than it would inspire, especially in the armed forces and the border
states.
The North was radicalized on this issue through the
course of the war, with Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, which became
effective on Jan. 1, 1863, as the key turning point. Frederick Douglass, the
Black abolitionist whose son Lewis would fight under Montgomery’s brigade
command, thought January 1 should be celebrated forever as the end date of
slavery. But first the war had to be won.
And in Lincoln’s birth place, Major General Gordon Granger, commander of the federal Army of Kentucky, was worried that the state
was about to secede in protest against the Emancipation Proclamation. His
superior General Horatio Wright sent a message from his headquarters in Ohio to
General Henry Halleck in Washington on Dec. 30, 1862, discussing plans, if
necessary, to arrest Kentucky judges and legislators.
In June 1863, Montgomery led a raid up the Combahee River
deep into South Carolina, west of Charleston. Accompanying him was Harriet
Tubman, who played a key role as a civilian intelligence agent and guide, and
helped organize the enslaved people who were fleeing from plantations to the
two Navy boats – despite Confederate fire which killed at least one of them, a
girl. Both Montgomery and Tubman had become famous before the war in separate
endeavors to bring slaves to freedom, but those prewar numbers were dwarfed by
the almost 800 slaves freed in this one raid.
Montgomery went on to fight at the siege of Fort
Wagner and, in 1864, at the battles of Olustee and Westport. The more senior
Granger fought in the Tullahoma campaign of 1863, at the battles of Chickamauga
and Chattanooga, and around Mobile.
Meanwhile, the abolitionists continued their
political work. On April 8 1864, the U.S. Senate voted 38-6 to pass the 13th
Amendment to abolish slavery. On June 15 it passed the House 93-65, short of
the required two-thirds majority. Also in June, the Republican party platform
included and Lincoln endorsed an abolition plank, framing it as necessary to
support the Union. The issue was debated in the campaign, which was won in
November by the Republicans including Lincoln. He immediately made House adoption
of the 13th Amendment a top priority, which was achieved by a vote
of 119-56 on Jan. 31, 1865.
In early to mid 1864 Lincoln had thought his
re-election unlikely, but battlefield victories helped the Republican cause.
And even though his Democratic opponent George McClellan retained considerable popularity in the Army, the soldiers’ vote went heavily for Lincoln.
There is no record of the word “Juneteenth” appearing
in print during the lifetimes of Montgomery or Granger. It was an
African-American dialect word deriving from the date, June 19, 1865, on which
General Order No. 3 was issued by Granger, the new commander of the District of
Texas.
Granger had arrived by ship in Galveston
two days previously with 1,800 troops to assert federal control over the
largest American state. Texas, unlike most of the Confederacy, had not been
conquered by the Union Army. Its ruling class, as shown by contemporary
newspapers, remained unconvinced that the U.S. government would actually
enforce the abolition of slavery, and thought some system of forced labor would
remain in place. The enslaved people of Texas, many of whom had been brought
there from other Confederate states, were unsure what would happen.
Granger was no ideologue. But he thought it
necessary, on his own authority, to use language strong enough to make clear to
everyone, White and Black, the position of the U.S. government: “The people of
Texas are informed that, in accordance with a proclamation from the Executive
of the United States, all slaves are free. This involves an absolute equality
of personal rights between former masters and slaves, and the connection
heretofore existing between them becomes that between employer and hired labor.
…”
For the next decade and more, Republican
politicians and the U.S. Army and law enforcement, including General and
President Ulysses S. Grant, tried to turn expressions such as “absolute
equality” into law and reality, in which efforts they were partly successful.
Their allies included some courageous former Confederate soldiers, such as
Grant’s attorney general, Amos Akerman, who led the campaign to smash the Ku
Klux Klan in 1870-71, and James “Pete” Longstreet, Grant’s friend before and
after the war. Longstreet led largely African-American police and militia who
battled White League rioters in New Orleans in 1874, after which Grant sent in
federal troops to restore order.
Yet Reconstruction ended with the Grant
administration in 1877, and many of its gains were lost.
In Texas, however, Juneteenth was
celebrated annually in Black churches, picnics and parades, becoming a focus of
community self-help, creativity and empowerment. It spread slowly through the
South, and contributed to a new
civil rights movement, led by nonviolent African-Americans, which in the
mid-20th century succeeded in dismantling Jim Crow abuses and restoring the advances
lost after the collapse of Reconstruction.
Douglass, an admirer and ally of Grant’s,
did not live to see a national holiday adopted to celebrate the end of slavery.
When it did happen in 2021, 156 years after the end of the war, June 19 was
chosen and not January 1, as he had suggested. Tubman has been proposed to
replace the slaveholder and Indian-remover Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill.
In the 1980s a bipartisan political
movement created a national holiday to honor Martin Luther King. Juneteenth was
enacted last year on a similar basis, and there does not seem to be significant
opposition to putting Tubman’s picture on U.S. currency.
But it may be helpful to clarify the
issue. The Lost Cause school of Civil War history, highly influential for much
of the 20th century, was broadly conservative and sympathetic to the
South, idealizing its agrarian, aristocratic, chivalric qualities, while
unfairly deprecating northern leaders such as Lincoln and Grant. It has something
in common with its apparent opposite, the modern aesthetic reaction against
“white savior” narratives, which is often combined with harsh judgment of Union
leaders as insufficiently anti-racist by 21st century standards. Both
viewpoints tend to minimize the extent to which the Civil War was about
abolishing slavery.
The truth is that America’s costliest war
– perhaps 750,000 dead -- was always about slavery. The initial cause was
preventing its expansion, which both sides saw as likely to lead to its
ultimate extinction. By 1864, with the war still raging, most northerners
explicitly endorsed abolition. That became what Union soldiers, White and
Black, were fighting and dying for. Those historical facts are not erased by
the persistence of racism and the long-term difficulty of enforcing Granger’s
proclamation.
While Juneteenth does celebrate the
resilient courage of African-American culture in the long wake of slavery and
Civil War, it also memorializes an immense national sacrifice.
No comments:
Post a Comment